Cases 1 - 10 of 234
WHEATLEY v. STAPLES
as 3:2024cv00251
Plaintiff:
TERENCE EDWARD WHEATLEY
Defendant:
BONNIE HANNA STAPLES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. DIXON
as 1:2024cv00041
Petitioner:
EDWARD LEE BROWN
Respondent:
ASHLEY MOODY and RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCGLAUN v. DIXON
as 5:2024cv00045
Petitioner:
JOHN EDWARD MCGLAUN
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA and RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
COBURN v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 5:2024cv00035
Petitioner:
PALMER EDWARD COBURN
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BARTON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2023cv24699
Petitioner:
EDWARD C BARTON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ALEXANDER v. ESCAMBIA COUNTY CITY HALL COUNTY COMMISSIONERS et al
as 3:2023cv24632
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD ALEXANDER, JR
Defendant:
ESCAMBIA COUNTY CITY HALL COUNTY COMMISSIONERS and CHIP SIMMONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv24237
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
SPEAR v. SMITH et al
as 4:2023cv00364
Plaintiff:
EDWARD LEE SPEAR
Defendant:
SMITH, DEANTE M MCMILLIAN, LEON FOREMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GLICK v. CORBIN et al
as 1:2023cv00165
Plaintiff:
BRIAN EDWARD GLICK
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER L J CORBIN, J C LANIER and L J CORBIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GLICK v. CORBIN et al
as 1:2023cv00146
Plaintiff:
BRIAN EDWARD GLICK
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER L J CORBIN and CLASSIFICATION OFC J C LANIER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
