Cases 1 - 10 of 112
JOHNSON v. NEEL et al
as 3:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
SHAQUON R JOHNSON
Defendant:
J NEEL, E MANNERS, S GREENE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. MILLER et al
as 4:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
MARIO M THOMAS
Defendant:
JAMES WILLIAM MILLER, SHAWN SWAIN and DAWN A HART
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER v. DIXON
as 1:2024cv00058
Petitioner:
MICHEAL DEVON MILLER
Respondent:
RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MILLER v. DIXON
as 1:2024cv00057
Petitioner:
MICHAEL DEVON MILLER
Respondent:
RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JONES v. KING et al
as 4:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
JESSIE W JONES and JESSIE WIMSY JONES
Defendant:
JOSHEPH J BIDEN, WAKULLA ANNEX CORRECTION INSTITUTION SHIFT SUPERVISOR, SGT DICKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER v. GRACEVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 5:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
WILLIS ARMANDO MILLER
Defendant:
GRACEVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER v. CENTURION et al
as 4:2023cv00529
Plaintiff:
JAMAL ARTHERIO MILLER, SR
Defendant:
CENTURION, GILBERT NOE, PAUL A AIELLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER v. DIXON
as 4:2023cv00517
Petitioner:
DAVID R MILLER
Respondent:
RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MILLER v. GABBY
as 4:2023cv00351
Petitioner:
CANDICE MILLER
Respondent:
WARDEN GABBY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ARCHILLA v. LNU et al
as 4:2023cv00330
Plaintiff:
SERGIO D. ARCHILLA
Defendant:
TODD LNU, GREGORY LNU, J BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
