Cases 1 - 10 of 21
PRIESTER v. HARRIS et al
as 3:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
DAVID PRIESTER, JAMES THOMAS and DAVID JACKSON
Defendant:
SCOTT S HARRIS, GRANT MALOY, EUGENE GRINBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FAISON v. CORTES et al
as 4:2023cv00205
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW LEO FAISON, MAESTRO FAISON and JAME FAISON
Defendant:
A CORTES, E HAND, S MCDONALD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POLK v. LOPEZ-RIVERA et al
as 3:2023cv10538
Plaintiff:
VERNON S POLK
Defendant:
LOPEZ-RIVERA, V MYERS, J SLOAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POLK v. LOPEZ-RIVERA et al
as 5:2023cv00135
Plaintiff:
VERNON S POLK
Defendant:
LOPEZ-RIVERA, V MYERS, J SLOAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEN v. SANTIAGO et al
as 3:2022cv06745
Plaintiff:
DERRICK ALLEN
Defendant:
J SANTIAGO, C MAIRANA, A MOLINA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEN v. SANTIAGO et al
as 3:2022cv03145
Plaintiff:
DERRICK ALLEN
Defendant:
J SANTIAGO, C MAIORANA, A MOLINA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SNYDER v. INCH et al
as 4:2021cv00380
Plaintiff:
EDWARD SNYDER
Defendant:
MARK S INCH, L NOLES, S BEARDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ISRAEL v. INCH et al
as 1:2021cv00082
Plaintiff:
MARK INCH and CONNIE RAY ISRAEL
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, TRIABE MEDICAL, R MOLINA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FAISON v. GLOBAL EXPERTS OUTSOURCING et al
as 3:2020cv05828
Defendant:
ANDRES MOLINA, MARSHA NICHOLS, CHARLES MAIORARIA and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW LEVI FAISON, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BEVERLIN v. PETERSEN et al
as 1:2020cv00178
Defendant:
ARPN L PETERSEN, CEO STEVEN WHEELER, R MOLING and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HENRY BEVERLIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
