Cases 1 - 10 of 13
MUJICA v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 4:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
KERVIN MORENO MUJICA, SR
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA and LAURA ANNE ROSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RODRIQUEZ-RABIN v. PISTRO
as 5:2023cv00130
Petitioner:
ROSE RODRIGUEZ RABIN and ROSE RODRIGUEZ-RABIN
Respondent:
KEVIN PISTRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BLACK v. PISTRO et al
as 5:2023cv00093
Petitioner:
GALEN FOSTER BLACK
Respondent:
KEVIN PISTRO, T EASTER, ED GONZALES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CHESTNUT v. ROSE et al
as 4:2022cv00465
Defendant:
Amy Rose, JAMES CARTER, LUIS RODRIGUEZ and others
Plaintiff:
GERNARD D CHESTNUT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DEWITT v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2019cv01990
Defendant:
J ROGERS, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JACKIE FLOYD and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY KENT DEWITT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 4:2017cv00052
Plaintiff:
GREGORY HARRIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , STATE OF FLORIDA , DADE COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
HAILE et al v. HOUGHSTEIN et al
as 4:2016cv00621
Plaintiff:
J JAY SANDERS HAILE, VII and R JENKINS
Defendant:
J JONES, P J BONDI, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAMERON v. ARCHER et al
as 5:2015cv00284
Plaintiff:
WESLEY ADAM CAMERON
Defendant:
KENDES ARCHER, NICKI GARDNER, STANLEY MITCHELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FOURSTAR v. ARCHER et al.
as 5:2015cv00248
Plaintiff:
VICTOR C FOURSTAR, JR
Defendant:
KENDES ARCHER, MELISSA ALEXANDER, LANCE DIXON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ST ROSE v. HOLDER et al
as 4:2014cv00571
Petitioner:
ALWYNE FITZGERALD ST ROSE
Respondent:
ERIC H HOLDER, JR, JANET NAPOLITANO, MARC J MOORE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
