Cases 11 - 20 of 20
THOMPSON v. GREYHOUND LINES INC
as 3:2012cv00119
Plaintiff:
THEODORE J THOMPSON
Defendant:
GREYHOUND LINES INC, COLONIAL TRAILWAYS INC and TERRY REEVES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
THOMPSON v. GREYHOUND LINES INC
as 3:2012cv00004
Plaintiff:
THEODORE J THOMPSON
Defendant:
GREYHOUND LINES INC, DOES, COLONIAL TRAILWAYS INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00510
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
THOMAS v. GREYHOUND LINES INC
as 4:2010cv00393
Plaintiff:
JOE THOMAS
Defendant:
GREYHOUND LINES INC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STROUD et al v. NORTH AMERICAN VAN LINES INC et al
as 1:2009cv00169
Plaintiff:
ROBERT TODD STROUD and MARIANNE STROUD
Defendant:
NORTH AMERICAN VAN LINES INC and A-TURNER MOVING & STORAGE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81 Damaged Goods While Being Transported
STROUD et al v. NORTH AMERICAN VAN LINES INC et al
as 4:2009cv00285
Plaintiff:
ROBERT TODD STROUD and MARIANNE STROUD
Defendant:
NORTH AMERICAN VAN LINES INC and A-TURNER MOVING & STORAGE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81 Damaged Goods While Being Transported
EARL v. SOUTHEASTERN FREIGHT LINES INC
as 3:2008cv00459
Plaintiff:
MARY M EARL
Defendant:
SOUTHEASTERN FREIGHT LINES INC and DARA M SCHMIDT
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00427
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
THOMAS v. GREYHOUND LINES INC
as 4:2008cv00399
Plaintiff:
JOE THOMAS
Defendant:
GREYHOUND LINES INC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
NUNN et al v. JORDAN TRANSFER COMPANY, INC et al
as 5:2008cv00005
Plaintiff:
THOMAS NUNN and STACEY NUNN
Defendant:
JORDAN TRANSFER COMPANY, INC, BLUE SKY VAN LINES, INC., CARLYLE VAN LINES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
