Cases 11 - 20 of 139
BARRETT II v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv03054
Plaintiff:
GARLAND BARRETT II
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BEAM III v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv00829
Plaintiff:
GARLAND HAL BEAM III
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
NELSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2023cv01893
Plaintiff:
GARLAND NELSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ZIEGENHORN et al v. MOODY et al
as 3:2023cv12134
Plaintiff:
JOEL GARLAND ZIEGENHORN and ANNE FRANCES ZIEGENHORN
Defendant:
ASHLEY MOODY, GINGER BOWDEN MADDEN, LYNN MIY AMOTO HOSHIHARA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MARTINEZ v. UNKNOWN
as 4:2023cv00185
Plaintiff:
NELSON MARTINEZ
Defendant:
MILLER, SGT ANDERSON, UNKNOWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARLAND v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv14931
Plaintiff:
ERIC GARLAND
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CRAWFORD v. GARLAND
as 5:2023cv00080
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO D CRAWFORD and ASIA CRAWFORD
Defendant:
COLETTE PETERS and MERRICK GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
GARLAND v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv06684
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Garland
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
