Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Cases 31 - 36 of 36
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 0.15 OF AN ACRE OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, SITUATE IN ESCAMBIA COUNTY, STATE OF FLORIDA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv00072
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: 0.15 OF AN ACRE OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, SITUATE IN ESCAMBIA COUNTY, STATE OF FLORIDA, AMERICAN ASSETS, INC., THE ESTATE OF WALTER EUGENE BECKHAM, deceased and his heirs at law and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 258 (a) Public Buildings & Property: Land Condem
MORALES v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv00497
Plaintiff: SEPHI-OMAR MORALES
Defendant: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FULLER v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2009cv00344
Petitioner: RUBEN IVAN FULLER
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NELSON v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2009cv00157
Petitioner: ERNEST HOWARD NELSON
Respondent: DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROULHAC v. MCNEIL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2009cv00056
Petitioner: RICKY ROULHAC
Respondent: WALTER A MCNEIL and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ROULHAC v. MCNEIL et al
as 5:2009cv00067
Petitioner: RICKY ROULHAC
Respondent: WALTER A MCNEIL and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?