Cases 71 - 80 of 94
RAGSDALE v. J&M DOZER SERVICE INC et al
as 3:2015cv00150
Plaintiff:
SETH RAGSDALE
Defendant:
J&M DOZER SERVICE INC and JOHN GODWIN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
RAINES v. PAYNE
as 5:2014cv00339
Plaintiff:
FRANKIE RAINES
Defendant:
S PAYNE, L GODWIN, IZUEGBU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUNN v. ESCAMBIA COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARMENT et al
as 3:2014cv00590
Plaintiff:
JARED DUNN
Defendant:
ESCAMBIA COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, TOBY GRICE and TRINA GODWIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORGAN et al v. ELECTRICAL SERVICES OF PENSACOLA INC et al
as 3:2014cv00303
Plaintiff:
CHARLES MORGAN and MARK HOLDER
Defendant:
ELECTRICAL SERVICES OF PENSACOLA INC, THOMAS GODWIN and CARLA GODWIN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
MATTHEWS v. PARKER et al
as 4:2014cv00289
Defendant:
JENNIFER PARKER, JEFFREY BEASLEY, HEATHER ROBINSON and others
Plaintiff:
CECIL BRADLEY MATTHEWS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00102
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
EAST PASS INVESTORS LLC ET AL v. M/V KELLY GIRL ET AL
as 3:2014cv00093
Plaintiff:
EAST PASS INVESTORS LLC , HARBOR WALK LLC and PELICAN POINT HARBOR LLC
Defendant:
M/V KELLY GIRL, M/V ONE OF A KIND, GODWIN BROS INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
DEMARSH v. GODWIN
as 3:2013cv00605
Plaintiff:
MONDAY LEE DEMARSH
Defendant:
GODWIN, CARROL, PIPPIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. MCGEE, et al
as 5:2013cv00366
Plaintiff:
TALRIS T BROWN
Defendant:
GARY MCGEE, ANDREW GODWIN and PATRICK CRAWFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHARLES MORGAN et al v. ELECTRICAL SERVICES OF PENSACOLA INC et al
as 3:2013cv00294
Plaintiff:
CHARLES MORGAN and MACK HOLDER
Defendant:
ELECTRICAL SERVICES OF PENSACOLA INC , THOMAS GODWIN and CARLA GODWIN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
