Cases 81 - 90 of 429,544
INTELLIGENT MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS LLC v. NUOVO PARTS INC
as 3:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
INTELLIGENT MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS, LLC doing business as CONSULTING AND EXPERT SERVICES
Defendant:
NUOVO PARTS, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
COLLIER v. FL BOARD OF EDUCATION BOARD OF GOVERNOR et al
as 1:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
IRINA COLLIER
Defendant:
FL BOARD OF EDUCATION BOARD OF GOVERNOR, CHARLES WADE COLLIER and D TRUMP
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
DAWSON v. DIXON
as 5:2024cv00107
Petitioner:
CHARLES DAWSON
Respondent:
RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
VALENTINE v. JPAY INCORPORATED LLC
as 4:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
PETER VALENTINE
Defendant:
JPAY INCORPORATED LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCKENZIE v. FORD
as 5:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant:
MEGAN JOANN FORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DESHIELDS v. O'MALLEY
as 5:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
DAVIS ALAN DESHIELDS
Defendant:
MARTIN J O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
SRTJR, LLC et al v. ARCH SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 3:2024cv00243
Plaintiff:
SRTJR, LLC and Optima Capital, LLC
Defendant:
ARCH SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
