Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Cases 1 - 10 of 817
ALLEN v. SUTTON et al
as 3:2024cv00252
Plaintiff: SHER'MON A ALLEN
Defendant: ADAM SUTTON, R QUINN, CHARLES RICKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOULLARD v. QUINN et al
as 3:2024cv00253
Plaintiff: RANDY L WOULLARD
Defendant: R QUINN, CHARLES RICKS, DONALD LEAVINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WASHINGTON v. SHELL et al
as 3:2024cv00245
Plaintiff: GREGORY F WASHINGTON
Defendant: K SHELL and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOULLARD v. JACOBSEN et al
as 3:2024cv00227
Plaintiff: RANDY L WOULLARD
Defendant: K JACOBSEN, R F CALDWELL, CHARLES RICKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EVANS v. DOE et al
as 3:2024cv00220
Plaintiff: DENZEL EVANS
Defendant: JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHAMBERS v. NICOLAS et al
as 3:2024cv00212
Plaintiff: KEION NATHANIEL CHAMBERS
Defendant: C NICOLAS and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CADEJUSTE v. DIXON et al
as 4:2024cv00208
Plaintiff: MARCO THONY CADEJUSTE
Defendant: RICKY DIXON, Z CULPEPPER and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALLESKE v. CHILDS et al
as 4:2024cv00203
Plaintiff: CLARENCE WALLESKE
Defendant: LARRY CHILDS, RONTERRIOUS WILLIAMS, JOHN DOES 1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MURZIKE v. QUINN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00196
Plaintiff: JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant: R QUINN, W GIELOW, J SANTIAGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BALL v. DOES 1-X et al
as 4:2024cv00181
Plaintiff: DENNIS ANDREW BALL
Defendant: JOHN DOES 1-X, JANE DOES 1-X, ABC CORPORATIONS 1-X and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?