Cases 1 - 10 of 50
BARROW v. ATTORNEY GENERAL
as 3:2024cv00107
Petitioner:
MARK BARROW
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BARROWS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv33685
Plaintiff:
BRIAN BARROWS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BARROW v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv26516
Plaintiff:
DANIEL BARROW
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BARROW v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv17433
Plaintiff:
ANDREW BARROW
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BARROWS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv13290
Plaintiff:
DONALD BARROWS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BARROW v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv09431
Plaintiff:
ROBIN BARROW
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BARROW v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv21323
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER RAYMOND BARROW
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RODRIGUEZ v. AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTY UNION et al
as 3:2023cv16482
Plaintiff:
DARIO M RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTY UNION, BABECOCK, BAGLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARROW v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv11078
Plaintiff:
ROBIN BARROW
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BARROW v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv10763
Plaintiff:
GREGORY C. BARROW
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
