Cases 1 - 10 of 38
MOORE v. FINKE et al
as 3:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
LARRANCE DURELLE MOORE
Defendant:
OKALOOSA COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE, OKALOOSA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, DAVID RICHARD FINKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAWLS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv34989
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY RAWLS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RAWLINGS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv32095
Plaintiff:
GERALD RAWLINGS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RAWLS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv18324
Plaintiff:
ALLEN RAWLS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RAWLS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv13261
Plaintiff:
SHIRLEY RAWLS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RAWLS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv09529
Plaintiff:
KAYLYN RAWLS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RAWLS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13650
Plaintiff:
KELLY MONKEITH RAWLS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RAWLS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv67817
Plaintiff:
NICKALUS RAWLS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAWLS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv50893
Plaintiff:
ALLEN RAWLS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROBERTS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv11256
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RAWLE ROBERTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
