Cases 1 - 10 of 50
UTTERBACK v. MORRIS
as 3:2023cv24652
Plaintiff:
THOMAS M UTTERBACK
Defendant:
CRAIG B MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
UTTERBACK v. MORRIS
as 5:2023cv00279
Plaintiff:
THOMAS M UTTERBACK
Defendant:
CRAIG B MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FORTNER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv04328
Plaintiff:
THOMAS M FORTNER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MONTALBANO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv02043
Plaintiff:
THOMAS M MONTALBANO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CONNORS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv02147
Plaintiff:
THOMAS M CONNORS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
TEAGUE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2023cv00596
Plaintiff:
THOMAS M. TEAGUE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
DUNCAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv14134
Plaintiff:
THOMAS M DUNCAN, JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MARYNOWSKI v. BRADY et al
as 3:2023cv09113
Plaintiff:
STANLEY MARYNOWSKI
Defendant:
THOMAS M BRADY and LLOYD J AUSTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
PARRIS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv22852
Plaintiff:
THOMAS M PARRIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LAWTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv09388
Plaintiff:
THOMAS M LAWTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
