Cases 21 - 30 of 7,369
Hill v. Officer Leo et al
as 9:2024cv80688
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Demetrius Hill, Jr.
Defendant:
Officer Leo, Rick L Bradshaw, Lakeside Medical Center LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Leeds et al v. Gilliams et al
as 2:2024cv14170
Plaintiff:
Caitlin S. Leeds and Yesenia E. Morales
Defendant:
Damien Gilliams, Bonnie Fey-Gilliams and Sharkey's Draft House Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Leyva v. Space Coast Credit Union
as 2:2024cv14168
Plaintiff:
Jose Rendon Leyva
Defendant:
Space Coast Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Williams v. Robinson et al
as 0:2024cv60899
Plaintiff:
Quantell W. Williams
Defendant:
Austin J. Robinson and Bridgestone Retail Operations, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Whitton et al v. Pearson et al
as 2:2024cv14097
Plaintiff:
Alfred Whitton and Marjorie Whitton
Defendant:
Keith Pearson, Cortney Hoyt and Mark Acevedo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Shah et al v. Spirit Airlines, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv21143
Plaintiff:
Kartik Shah, Purvi Shah and A. S.
Defendant:
Spirit Airlines, Inc. and DOES 1 through 50 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Maragh v. American Airlines, Inc.
as 1:2024cv21145
Plaintiff:
Sasha Maragh
Defendant:
American Airlines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Crosby v. Town of Indian River Shores
as 2:2024cv14092
Plaintiff:
William B. Crosby, III
Defendant:
Town of Indian River Shores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
ARASTEH v. LUXURBAN HOTELS INC.
as 1:2024cv21987
Plaintiff:
ADAM ARASTEH
Defendant:
LUXURBAN HOTELS INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
ARASTEH v. LUXURBAN HOTELS INC. et al
as 1:2024cv21990
Plaintiff:
ADAM ARASTEH
Defendant:
LUXURBAN HOTELS INC. and TOWNHOUSE HOTEL, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
