Cases 11 - 20 of 86
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv14224
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv14220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Barberi v. 84 LUMBER COMPANY, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP et al
as 0:2021cv60649
Defendant:
PIERCE HARDY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and 84 LUMBER COMPANY, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Plaintiff:
Renzo Barberi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv60434
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Reed v. City of Fort Pierce, et al
as 2:2020cv14386
Defendant:
City Manager Nicholas C. Mimms, Diane Hobley-Burney, Chief of Police Diane Hobley-Burney and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. Richard Barrie Reed, II and Richard B Reed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Reed v. City of Fort Pierce et al
as 2:2020cv14385
Defendant:
City Manager Nicholas C. Mimms, City of Fort Pierce, Diane Hobley-Burney and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Barrie Reed, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pierce v. Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 0:2020cv62048
Defendant:
CIC INVESTORS #65, LTD d/b/a FLANIGANS SEAFOOD BAR AND GRILL, Flanigans Enterprises, Inc., Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Pierce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2020cv81884
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collins v. City of Fort Pierce et al
as 2:2020cv14311
Defendant:
Evens Santillen, City of Fort Pierce and Diane Hobley-Burney
Plaintiff:
Christine Collins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv14289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
