Cases 21 - 30 of 65
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv22279
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2020cv61078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
v. Boisson et al
as 1:2019cv24946
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Customs and Border Protection and Andre Boisson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0791
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2019cv81244
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2019cv61277
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Thomas v. Secretary of U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2019cv20660
Defendant:
STSO, Deputy Federal Security Director, STSO, MIA, G-Band and others
Plaintiff:
Chelsea Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Moorish National Republic et al v. U.S. Department of State et al
as 0:2018cv60779
Plaintiff:
Moorish National Republic, Moorish Theocratice Order of Zion, Consul General and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of State and U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ballesteros v. Department of Homeland Security
as 1:2018cv20608
Plaintiff:
Ricardo A. Ballesteros
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Paes de Barros v. Chief of the Immigrant Investor Program et al
as 1:2017cv20947
Plaintiff:
Luis Fernando Paes de Barros
Defendant:
Chief of the Immigrant Investor Program , Director U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services , Deputy Chief Immigrant Investor Program and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv21023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
