Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60595
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Caplan v. Rofego Motors, Inc. et al
as 9:2023cv80518
Plaintiff:
Howard Michael Caplan
Defendant:
Rofego Motors, Inc. and Purdy Lane Investments, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2022cv81668
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Walsh v. Judge Cynthia Cox et al
as 2:2022cv14180
Plaintiff:
Meghan Walsh
Defendant:
Judge Cynthia Cox, Judge Robert Meadows, Alexis Echevarria and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Caplan v. Fast Lane Auto Repairs S Corp et al
as 0:2022cv60953
Plaintiff:
Howard Michael Caplan
Defendant:
Fast Lane Auto Repairs S Corp and Vijay Ramlogan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
US Freedom Flyers et al v. Atlas Air, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv21477
Plaintiff:
US Freedom Flyers, Lane Caviness, Patrick Akerlund and others
Defendant:
Atlas Air, Inc., Flight Services International, LLC, EncompassAir, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2021cv81011
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv20787
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv14071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2017cv80111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
