Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Rodriguez v. Lawson et al
as 2:2019cv14060
Defendant:
S. Milliken, Alberto Gonzales, Alan Lawson and others
Plaintiff:
Dario Micheal Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Lawson et al
as 2:2019cv14033
Defendant:
Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, Justice Alan Lawson, Lynretta Lynch and others
Plaintiff:
Dario Michael Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv22114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Writ of Mandamus
Garrick v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2007cv20953
Petitioner:
Gordon O'Neil Garrick
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Michael Rozos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Fatusin v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2007cv20946
Petitioner:
Tokunbo Franklin Fatusin
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales, Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McPherson v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2007cv20906
Petitioner:
Allan Devon McPherson
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales, Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Awala v. State of Florida et al
as 2:2007cv14048
Plaintiff:
Gbeke Michael Awala
Defendant:
State of Florida, Marcia G. Cooke, Stanley Marcus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2007cv20377
Plaintiff:
Mark Brown
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Julie Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Yang v. Gonzales et al
as 0:2007cv60010
Petitioner:
Hua Jin Yang
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales, Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
