Cases 11 - 20 of 38
Dugan v. McDonough et al
as 9:2007cv80511
Petitioner:
Robert J. Dugan
Respondent:
James R. McDonough and Bill McCollum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Way v. McDonough et al
as 9:2007cv80501
Petitioner:
Antwan Way
Respondent:
James R. McDonough and Bill McCollum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McGee v. McDonough et al
as 9:2007cv80485
Petitioner:
Ronnie Lee McGee
Respondent:
James R. McDonough and Bill McCollum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perrine v. McDonough
as 4:2007cv10045
Petitioner:
Carmen Perrine
Respondent:
James R. McDonough
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. McDonough et al
as 1:2007cv21399
Plaintiff:
Ben E. Smith
Defendant:
James R. McDonough and Bill McCollum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Diaz v. McDonough et al
as 1:2007cv21371
Plaintiff:
Elier Diaz
Defendant:
James R. McDonough and Bill McCollum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parker v. McDonough
as 0:2007cv60716
Petitioner:
Narcisso Parker
Respondent:
James R. McDonough
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
O'Connor v. McDonough
as 1:2007cv20954
Petitioner:
Sean O'Connor
Respondent:
Department Of Corrections, James R. McDonough and James R. McDonough
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. McDonough
as 1:2007cv20667
Petitioner:
Bernard Lewis
Respondent:
James R. McDonough and James R. McDonough
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Idlette v. Department Of Corrections et al
as 0:2007cv60566
Petitioner:
Lumomba Idlette
Respondent:
Department Of Corrections, James R. McDonough and James R. McDonough
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
