Cases 21 - 30 of 36
McCray v. Secretary, DOC et al
as 0:2014cv62864
Petitioner:
Harry McCray
Respondent:
Secretary, DOC and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fedex Techconnect, Inc. v. Expedited Docs Co.
as 9:2014cv81082
Plaintiff:
Fedex Techconnect, Inc.
Defendant:
Expedited Docs Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ortiz v. Secretary, DOC et al
as 9:2014cv80763
Petitioner:
Jose Perez Ortiz
Respondent:
Secretary, DOC and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nelms v. Secretary, DOC et al
as 9:2013cv80899
Petitioner:
Eric Nelms
Respondent:
Secretary, DOC and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Green v. Florida DOC Secretary
as 2:2013cv14232
Plaintiff:
Harold Wayne Green
Defendant:
Florida DOC Secretary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walter v. Dept. of Knowledge Secretary of DOC
as 1:2013cv21483
Plaintiff:
Reginald Walter
Defendant:
Dept. of Knowledge Secretary of DOC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Stinfil v. Sawyer et al
as 1:2013cv21330
Plaintiff:
Delvarice Stinfil
Defendant:
P. Sawyer, FNU Bergner, G. Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Meekins v. Secretary, DOC et al
as 2:2013cv14084
Petitioner:
Thomas Meekins
Respondent:
Secretary, DOC and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ash v. Secretary, DOC et al
as 2:2011cv14203
Petitioner:
Joshua Steven Ash
Respondent:
Secretary, DOC and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ash v. Secretary, DOC et al
as 4:2011cv10049
Petitioner:
Joshua Steven Ash
Respondent:
Secretary, DOC and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
