Cases 21 - 30 of 62
PEREZ v. DUNPHY
as 2:2009cv14377
Petitioner:
Edwin Perez
Respondent:
Fred Dunphy and Walter McNeil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Green v. McNeil et al
as 1:2009cv23000
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Green
Defendant:
Walter McNeil and Bill McCollum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roberts v. Pichardo et al
as 1:2009cv22918
Plaintiff:
Harry W. Roberts
Defendant:
G. Pichardo, L. M. Odom, Blondell Tate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Rehm v. McNeil et al
as 4:2009cv10090
Plaintiff:
Bret Rehm
Defendant:
Walter McNeil and Bill McCollum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv14310
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Writ of Mandamus
Johnson v. McNeil et al
as 1:2009cv81308
Plaintiff:
Christopher Leon Johnson
Defendant:
Walter McNeil, Willie Norwood, Vivian McCall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. McNeil et al
as 9:2009cv81308
Plaintiff:
Christopher Leon Johnson
Defendant:
Walter McNeil, Willie Norwood, Vivian McCall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Brandon v. McNeil et al
as 1:2009cv22634
Plaintiff:
Brandon
Defendant:
Walter McNeil, Secretary Department of Corrections and State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. McNeil et al
as 1:2009cv22515
Plaintiff:
Michael A Anderson
Defendant:
Walter McNeil and Bill McCollum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Williams v. McNeil et al
as 1:2009cv22490
Plaintiff:
Donald A. Williams
Defendant:
Walter McNeil and Bill McCollum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
