Cases 51 - 60 of 68
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2012cv61567
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Caplan v. Las Olas Finer Food Inc. et al
as 0:2012cv61541
Defendant:
Las Olas Finer Food Inc. and Samp Enterprises
Plaintiff:
Howard Michael Caplan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Caplan v. Quarterdeck Las Olas LC et al
as 0:2012cv61411
Defendant:
Quarterdeck Las Olas LC and Quarterdeck Properties L.C.
Plaintiff:
Howard Michael Caplan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Vegas Enterprises Pty Ltd v. Las Olas International et al
as 1:2012cv22161
Plaintiff:
Vegas Enterprises Pty Ltd
Defendant:
Las Olas International, Humberto Perez and Does 1 through 20, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
The Burlington Insurance Company, Inc. v. Dailey et al
as 1:2012cv21550
Plaintiff:
The Burlington Insurance Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Beverly Dailey, Las Olas Carriage Company, Ann Lavecchia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Edny v. Las Olas Finer Foods, Inc. et al
as 0:2012cv60079
Plaintiff:
Jean Edny
Defendant:
Las Olas Finer Foods, Inc. and Frank Samp
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2011cv62725
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Bado v. The Las Olas Company, Inc.,
as 0:2011cv60105
Plaintiff:
Charles Bado
Defendant:
The Las Olas Company, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Karakis v. Asian Dining Group, LLC et al
as 0:2009cv61260
Plaintiff:
Stephen A Karakis
Defendant:
Asian Dining Group, LLC and Las Olas Place II, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Karakis v. 904 Las Olas, Inc. et al
as 0:2009cv61255
Plaintiff:
Stephen A Karakis
Defendant:
904 Las Olas, Inc. and Mangos and Boyle Las Olas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
