Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Roberts et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv13263
Plaintiff:
James Roberts and Tammy Roberts
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv61788
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1446
Liskey v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 9:2021cv80446
Plaintiff:
James Robert Liskey
Defendant:
Glaxosmithkline LLC, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and John Does 1-100 Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roberts v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 0:2019cv61728
Plaintiff:
James Roberts
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Russo et al v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 9:2014cv80049
Respondent:
Commissioner of Social Security
Petitioner:
Dino Russo , Vonsheila Hatcher , Deni Michelle Ackeridge and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Heuss v. Crews
as 0:2013cv62720
Plaintiff:
James Robert Heuss
Defendant:
Michael D. Crews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2012cv81037
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Richardson v. Ginther et al
as 1:2012cv22895
Plaintiff:
James Robert Richardson
Defendant:
Jason Ginther, M. Katherine Koonz, Monique Botero and others
Cause Of Action: Bivens - Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Rice v. United States of America
as 1:2011cv22172
Plaintiff:
James Robert Rice
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Sewell v. Leonard
as 9:2010mc80380
Defendant:
James Robert Leonard, M.D.
Plaintiff:
Jerry L. Sewell
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
