Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Webcollex, LLC v. Mirza
as 0:2022cv60156
Plaintiff:
WEBCOLLEX, LLC d/b/a CKS FINANCIAL AS ASSIGNEE OF SALLIE MAE BANK and Webcollex, LLC doing business as CKS Financial as Assignee of Sallie Mae Bank
Defendant:
ASSAD S. MIRZA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv24091
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2017cv81373
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Kapgang v. Sallie Mae Bank
as 0:2017cv60983
Plaintiff:
Louis Kapgang
Defendant:
Sallie Mae Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Dual Diagnosis Treatment Center, Inc. et al v. Blue Cross of California d/b/a Anthem Blue Cross et al
as 0:2016mc62086
Defendant:
Blue Cross of California d/b/a Anthem Blue Cross, Natures Path Foods, Inc. Welfare Benefit Plan, Empire HealthChoice Assurance, Inc. d/b/a Empire BlueCross BlueShield and/or Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield and others
Plaintiff:
Dual Diagnosis Treatment Center, Inc, Dual Diagnosis Treatment Center, Inc., Sovereign Health of Florida, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv24044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
CAMPBELL v. Sallie Mae, Inc.
as 1:2014cv20858
Plaintiff:
CRAIG CAMPBELL
Defendant:
Sallie Mae, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2014cv80219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2014cv80042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Johnson v. Sallie Mae, Inc.
as 9:2013cv81333
Plaintiff:
Donny Johnson
Defendant:
Sallie Mae, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0151
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
