Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Cope v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv21922
Plaintiff:
Catherine Cope
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harper et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2019cv24327
Plaintiff:
Jessica Freire, Norman Allen Thompson, Kathy Euliano and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
RUBBER PATCH SOLUTIONS S.A. v. COPE Y CIA, LIMITADA
as 1:2019cv21934
Defendant:
COPE Y CIA, LIMITADA
Plaintiff:
RUBBER PATCH SOLUTIONS S.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv20448
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mediator:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2017cv61822
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mediator:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Woodson v. Strozier et al
as 1:2017cv22110
Defendant:
Marc W. Morris, Micheal J. Strozier, Katherine Fernandez-Rundle and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Damarcus Woodson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cope v. SYNCHRONY BANK, N.A.
as 0:2016cv61801
Plaintiff:
Robert Cope
Defendant:
SYNCHRONY BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Carrasquel v. Stone & Wood Design, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv20670
Plaintiff:
Dima De Jesus Ronda Carrasquel
Defendant:
Stone & Wood Design, Inc. and Manuel E. Miguel
Mediator:
Carol Soret Cope
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Cope v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 1:2015cv23383
Plaintiff:
Robert Charles Cope
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cope v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc.
as 1:2014cv23910
Plaintiff:
Robert Charles Cope
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
