Cases 41 - 50 of 2,584
GRAHAM v. BERRY
as 1:2023cv00210
Petitioner:
JOHNNY L GRAHAM
Respondent:
WARDEN WALTER BERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JONES v. ODUM
as 5:2023cv00482
Petitioner:
ANTONIO JONES
Respondent:
WARDEN ROY ODUM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LEE v. UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE
as 7:2023cv00134
Petitioner:
JAI DEVON LEE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
USSERY v. HOUSTON COUNTY GEORGIA
as 5:2023cv00481
Petitioner:
DONALD J USSERY, JR
Respondent:
HOUSTON COUNTY GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
STOKES v. CLERK SUPERIOR COURT OF RICHMOND COUNTY
as 5:2023cv00477
Petitioner:
JOSHUA KAREEM STOKES
Respondent:
CLERK SUPERIOR COURT OF RICHMOND COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DEMMON v. UNNAMED RESPONDENT
as 5:2023cv00468
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER COLLIN DEMMON
Respondent:
UNNAMED RESPONDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BURNETT v. UNNAMED RESPONDENT
as 3:2023cv00135
Petitioner:
KODY K BURNETT
Respondent:
UNNAMED RESPONDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BURKE v. SALES
as 5:2023cv00458
Petitioner:
WILLIAM BURKE
Defendant:
WARDEN TIMOTHY SALES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BALL v. SAMPSON
as 5:2023cv00445
Petitioner:
TRAVIS BALL
Respondent:
WARDEN GREGORY SAMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LEIGH v. GEORGIA STATE JUDICIAL SYSTEM
as 5:2023cv00432
Petitioner:
TREMAINE DESHUN LEIGH
Respondent:
GEORGIA STATE JUDICIAL SYSTEM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.