Cases 1 - 10 of 2,590
Jackman v. Kasper
as 1:2024cv00080
Petitioner:
Graham Jackman
Respondent:
JEANIE KASPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SLATON v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 5:2024cv00175
Petitioner:
MARCUS OCTAVIOUS SLATON
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TAYLOR v. GEORGIA
as 4:2024cv00080
Petitioner:
ZACHARY BOUVIER TAYLOR
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HILLMAN v. SELF et al
as 5:2024cv00169
Petitioner:
MARVIN HILLMAN, III
Respondent:
JUDGE TILLMAN E. SELF, JUDGE CONNIE LYNN WILLIFORD, DISTRICT ATTORNEY CLIFFORD T WOODY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
HODGES v. COLQUITT COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
as 1:2024cv00076
Petitioner:
EDWARD HODGES
Respondent:
COLQUITT COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
QUINN v. JOHNSON STATE PRISON
as 5:2024cv00163
Petitioner:
RANDALL TULLY QUINN
Respondent:
JOHNSON STATE PRISON
Other:
ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF GEORGIA (NOTICE)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WOODS v. WIZA
as 4:2024cv00071
Petitioner:
FABIAN WOODS, JR
Respondent:
Warden SCOTT WIZA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CHAPMAN v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 5:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
YAQUAN LAVETT SANDY CHAPMAN
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SCOTT v. BOBBITT
as 4:2024cv00068
Petitioner:
DEMETRICE SCOTT
Respondent:
Warden TREVONZA BOBBITT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HENDERSON v. BERNARD
as 4:2024cv00067
Petitioner:
TAVARRES HENDERSON and JUHIIV ALI MUHAMMIED
Respondent:
TERRY BERNARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
