Cases 131 - 140 of 2,435
ALLEN v. NORTH AMERICA et al
as 5:2023cv00472
Plaintiff:
DENVER FENTON ALLEN
Defendant:
NORTH AMERICA, SOUTH AMERICA, NORTH POLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL v. ATHENS-CLARKE COUNTY JAIL et al
as 3:2023cv00137
Plaintiff:
JAMES EARL HILL, JR
Defendant:
ATHENS-CLARKE COUNTY JAIL and SHERIFF JOHN Q WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RIGGS v. STEWART et al
as 7:2023cv00124
Plaintiff:
DANIEL EUGENE RIGGS
Defendant:
VICTORIA STEWART and JERMAINE WHITE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOVE v. MOORE et al
as 3:2023cv00133
Plaintiff:
DOMINICK DOVE
Defendant:
SHERIFF MICHAEL MOORE and MADISON COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURTCH v. FRANKLIN COUNTY PROBATE COURT
as 3:2023cv00132
Plaintiff:
CURTIS DEAN BURTCH, JR
Defendant:
FRANKLIN COUNTY PROBATE COURT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THORNTON v. SMOKES et al
as 5:2023cv00465
Plaintiff:
GEORGETTE BENITA THORNTON
Defendant:
OFFICER MS SMOKES, WARDEN MS FLOWERS, COMMISSIONER TYRONE OLIVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARDNER v. COWENA et al
as 5:2023cv00455
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY GARDNER
Defendant:
DR KENNETH COWENA, DEPUTY WARDEN L MCKENZIE and KENNETH COWENS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. DOOLY STATE PRISON
as 5:2023cv00456
Plaintiff:
ISSAC KING, JR
Defendant:
DOOLY STATE PRISON, JOHN OR JANE DOE, P A WOODARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
UPSHAW v. COMMUNITY SUPERVISION
as 4:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
UCASHA UPSHAW, SR
Defendant:
COMMUNITY SUPERVISION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARSH v. CLARKE COUNTY JAIL
as 3:2023cv00127
Plaintiff:
DAVID LAMAR MARSH
Defendant:
CLARKE COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
