Cases 111 - 120 of 10,400
BRYANT v. CLARKE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARMENT et al
as 3:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
CALVIN ROBERT-RICHARD BRYANT
Defendant:
CLARKE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARMENT, CLARKE COUNTY JAIL, ALVIN S GLENN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYD v. HANCOCK STATE PRISON et al
as 5:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
DAVIOUS MARQUES BOYD
Defendant:
HANCOCK STATE PRISON and Officer REINFROE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARHAM v. COLEMAN et al
as 5:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
MANDRELL PARHAM
Defendant:
CHARLES COLEMAN and CESAR SISKA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
BARNETT v. HANCOCK STATE PRISON et al
as 5:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
RANDY DEWAYNE BARNETT
Defendant:
HANCOCK STATE PRISON and DOCTOR CARL LIFT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. SAMPSON
as 5:2024cv00048
Petitioner:
EVERETT SMITH
Respondent:
GREGORY SAMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hallman v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
DERRICK HALLMAN
Defendant:
WARDEN OTIS SMITH, JONES and SABRINA PORTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COOK v. PERRY
as 3:2024cv00009
Petitioner:
DANIEL DELANE COOK
Respondent:
WARDEN J KEVIN PERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CLARK v. USA
as 4:2024cv00033
Petitioner:
FREDDIE CLARK
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
AVERY v. SIZEMORE et al
as 1:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
CRAIG DEWAYNE AVERY
Defendant:
JUDGE SIZEMORE, LEWIS LAMB, LEE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
