Cases 121 - 130 of 10,607
HAVIOR v. USA
as 5:2024cv00248
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
JARVIS HAVIOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
ANTHONY v. PAGE
as 5:2024cv00247
Respondent:
WARDEN TRACY PAGE
Petitioner:
JAY'VON ANTHONY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SHEARRY v. USA
as 7:2024cv00071
Petitioner:
FRANKIE SHEARRY, JR
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
JACKSON v. SPROUL
as 1:2024cv00108
Respondent:
KEVIN SPROUL
Petitioner:
MELVIN JAMES JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ALLEN v. WORLD ALL SEVEN CONTINENTS et al
as 5:2024cv00245
Plaintiff:
DENVER FENTON ALLEN
Defendant:
WARDEN GREENE, WARDEN MARSHELL, VERZART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MILLER v. SPROUL
as 1:2024cv00107
Petitioner:
ROMAIN CORGILL MILLER
Respondent:
KEVIN SPROUL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NEWSOM v. IRWIN COUNTY DETENTION CENTER et al
as 7:2024cv00070
Defendant:
IRWIN COUNTY DETENTION CENTER MEDICAL PROVIDERS and IRWIN COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
Plaintiff:
JASON MICHAEL NEWSOM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DIXON v. BROWN et al
as 5:2024cv00243
Defendant:
SERGEANT HARDEN, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DEPUTY WARDEN CHAMBERS and others
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK DOUGLAS DIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BALL v. SAMPSON
as 5:2024cv00240
Respondent:
GREGORY SAMPSON
Petitioner:
TRAVIS BALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
