Cases 1 - 10 of 72
EVANS v. Lee County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2023cv00226
Plaintiff:
RODNEY C EVANS
Defendant:
LEE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, JOHN DOE 1-3 and JUDGE JIM THURMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. JOHN DOE et al
as 7:2023cv00016
Plaintiff:
BRYAN L JONES
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, Warden BEASLEY, Deputy Warden MARCUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARY v. BEASLEY et al
as 7:2022cv00120
Plaintiff:
RICHARD LEE GARY
Defendant:
WARDEN JACOB BEASLEY, OFFICER WILLIAMS, LT EVANS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MCCLENDON v. BEASLEY et al
as 7:2022cv00099
Plaintiff:
BRIAN EARL MCCLENDON
Defendant:
JACOB BEASLEY, HEATHER DAVIS, LT KATRINA DANIELS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NEGRIN v. EVANS et al
as 5:2022cv00300
Plaintiff:
ERIC M NEGRIN
Defendant:
NURSE BETTY EVANS, DOCTOR JAMES FAULK and CAPTAIN JOHN GARY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NEGRIN v. EVANS et al
as 5:2022cv00248
Plaintiff:
ERIC MATTHEW NEGRIN
Defendant:
NURSE BETTY EVANS, DR JAMES GRAHAM, DR MICHEALS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GILLIS v. SAIDANA et al
as 5:2022cv00177
Plaintiff:
FRANK GILLIS
Defendant:
LT SAIDANA, LT WHITEHEAD, WARDEN TARMARSHE SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RODGERS v. HAMMACK-EVANS et al
as 1:2022cv00004
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN RODGERS
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN HAMMACK-EVANS and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRIS-EVANS v. LOCKETT et al
as 5:2021cv00331
Plaintiff:
JAVANTE HARRIS-EVANS
Defendant:
CERT OFFICER LOCKETT and CERT OFFICER WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. EVANS et al
as 1:2021cv00045
Defendant:
SHERIFF KEVIN SPROUL, OFFICER JANE DOE, OFC. MRS. EVANS and others
Plaintiff:
JOHNNIE DEMOND JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
