Cases 1 - 10 of 320
FLORENCE v. HYLES et al
as 4:2024cv00084
Petitioner:
KIM CAMILLE FLORENCE
Respondent:
U.S. MAGISTRATE STEPHEN HYLES, Judge CLAY D LAND, Judge BOBBY PETERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ALLEN v. OLIVER
as 7:2024cv00046
Petitioner:
MONALETA D ALLEN
Respondent:
TYRONE OLIVER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HULING v. USA
as 4:2024cv00050
Petitioner:
CURTIS D HULING
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
RUSSAW v. TALTON et al
as 5:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
ALBERT MARIO RUSSAW
Defendant:
CULLEN TALTON, ADA RODRIGO L SILVA, EDWARD D LUKEMIRE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. WITHERS
as 1:2024cv00011
Petitioner:
WILLIAM SMITH, III
Respondent:
WARDEN SHANNON D WITHERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
AMERSON v. HALL et al
as 5:2023cv00498
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER AMERSON
Defendant:
CORNELIA D HALL, CHRISTOPHER CARR, SHERRY BOSTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00495
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
JACKSON v. BOBBITT et al
as 1:2023cv00209
Plaintiff:
TREVELIS D JACKSON
Defendant:
WARDEN BOBBITT, DEPUTY WARDEN PEOPLES, OFFICER MARNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COBB v. RICHARDSON et al
as 1:2023cv00188
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM QUANTAVIOUS COBB
Defendant:
SHIFT COMMANDER HARRIETT L RICHARDSON, OFFICER J'SHON D PRICE, OFFICER GLORIA SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00397
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
