Cases 141 - 150 of 639
MAJOR v. JONES et al
as 7:2021cv00051
Defendant:
DON LEON BROCKINGTON, Officer JONES, LEE ANNA SMITH and others
Plaintiff:
JESSE DANIEL MAJOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NOWELL v. CROW et al
as 4:2021cv00067
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA, MUSCOGEE CIRCUIT COURT and Warden JOHN CROW, III
Plaintiff:
ANDY NOWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCGEE v. PAULK et al
as 7:2021cv00069
Defendant:
Judge ELIZABETH CLEVELAND, Sheriff ASHLEY PAULK, MICHAEL RICE and others
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO MCGEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NOWELL v. CROW et al
as 4:2021cv00068
Respondent:
Warden JOHN CROW, III, MUSCOGEE CIRCUIT COURT and STATE OF GEORGIA
Petitioner:
ANDY NOWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
EDWARDS v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 1:2021cv00080
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, CALHOUN STATE PRISON, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
RANDY EDWARDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOWARD v. WEBB et al
as 5:2021cv00177
Defendant:
REIDSVILLE STATE PRISON, SERGEANT WEBB, HANCOCK STATE PRISON and others
Plaintiff:
XAVIER HOWARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OUTLER v. STATE OF GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al.
as 1:2021cv00049
Defendant:
Ofc Taraus Grimsley, Ofc Timothy Davis, WARDEN TAMARSHE SMITH and others
Plaintiff:
Angel Manuel Ortiz and SANDRA OUTLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILEY v. WARD et al
as 5:2021cv00119
Respondent:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY C WARD, WARDEN MEOSHA MCMILLAN and STATE OF GEORGIA
Petitioner:
CRYSTAL D WILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 5:2021cv00061
Plaintiff:
ABDUL MALIK BEY and GRADY RENARD WILLIAMS, JR
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MEREDITH v. WARD
as 1:2021cv00042
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF GEORGIA (NOTICE), TIMOTHY WARD and WARDEN STEVE UPTON
Petitioner:
KENNETH WAYNE MEREDITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
