Cases 21 - 30 of 84
COX v. WAL-MART STORES EAST LP
as 7:2022cv00076
Plaintiff:
BETTY COX
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST LP and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
COX v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP et al
as 4:2022cv00098
Plaintiff:
MIRANDA COX
Defendant:
WAL MART STORES EAST LP and ALLWAY TOOLS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
GOINS v. WAL-MART STORES EAST LP
as 1:2022cv00076
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN GOINS
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST LP doing business as WAL-MART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Non-Motor Vehicle
STANLEY v. WAL-MART STORES EAST LP et al
as 7:2022cv00037
Plaintiff:
Nichole Stanley
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST LP, Rashema Deloach, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Non-Motor Vehicle
FREEMAN v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
as 4:2022cv00051
Plaintiff:
EDWARD FREEMAN
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
BENTON v. SAMS EAST INC et al
as 4:2022cv00022
Plaintiff:
Vickie Benton
Defendant:
SAM'S EAST INC, WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP, WAL-MART STORES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00458
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
CROSS v. WAL-MART STORES EAST LP (DELAWARE)
as 1:2021cv00121
Plaintiff:
India Teresa Cross
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST LP (DELAWARE) and WALMART STORES EAST LP DELAWARE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COOPER v. WAL-MART STORES EAST LP et al
as 1:2021cv00113
Plaintiff:
JOSEPHINE COOPER
Defendant:
CHIQUITA BRANDS INTERNATIONAL INC and WAL-MART STORES EAST LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ILER v. WAL MART STORES EAST LP et al
as 3:2021cv00038
Plaintiff:
AMY ILER
Defendant:
WAL MART STORES EAST LP and WALMART INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
