Cases 1 - 10 of 38
MADDOX v. MIMS et al
as 5:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
VIRGIL LAMAR MADDOX
Defendant:
CHARLES MIMS, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, COMMISSIONER TYRONE OLIVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PUGH v. MIMS
as 4:2023cv00201
Petitioner:
OTIS WADE PUGH, SR
Respondent:
Warden CHARLES MIMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BATTLE v. MIMS
as 5:2023cv00487
Petitioner:
TERRY LEE BATTLE
Respondent:
CHARLES M MIMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BENNING v. GEORGIA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS, et al
as 5:2023cv00371
Plaintiff:
RALPH HARRISON BENNING
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF GEORGIA, WARDEN CHARLES MIMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ELLISON v. MIMS
as 5:2023cv00368
Petitioner:
MICHAEL A ELLISON
Respondent:
CHARLES MIMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BEY v. WHITTINGTON, et al.
as 5:2023cv00354
Plaintiff:
ABDUL MALIK BEY
Defendant:
LAWRENCE WHITTINGTON, WARDEN CHARLES MIMS, TIMOTHY SALES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KERCH v. MIMS et al
as 5:2023cv00325
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP N KERCH
Defendant:
CHARLES MIMS, DEPUTY WARDEN TONYA ASHLEY, CAPTAIN MELISSA LAWSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. EMMONS et al
as 7:2023cv00075
Plaintiff:
KENDRICK R MARTIN
Defendant:
Warden S EMMONS, Warden R SHROPSHIRE, C MIMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MARTIN v. EMMONS et al
as 7:2023cv00063
Plaintiff:
KENDRICK R MARTIN
Defendant:
Warden S EMMONS, C MIMS, R SHROPSHIRE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KERCH v. FORD et al
as 5:2023cv00137
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP N KERCH
Defendant:
REGIONAL DIRECTOR BENJAMIN FORD, WARDEN CHARLES MIMS, DEPUTY WARDEN TONYA ASHLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
