Cases 1 - 10 of 325
TRANSBOTICS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Transbotics, a division of Scott Systems International, Inc.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, KPMG, LLP and INFINITY ROBOTICS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
WOODS v. WIZA
as 4:2024cv00071
Petitioner:
FABIAN WOODS, JR
Respondent:
Warden SCOTT WIZA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SCOTT v. BOBBITT
as 4:2024cv00068
Petitioner:
DEMETRICE SCOTT
Respondent:
Warden TREVONZA BOBBITT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
EDWARDS v. WIZA
as 5:2024cv00122
Petitioner:
JAMES MARCEL EDWARDS
Respondent:
SCOTT WIZA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SCOTT v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 5:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
DEMETRICE SCOTT
Defendant:
THE STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCGILLVARY v. HARTLEY et al
as 5:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
CALEB L MCGILLVARY
Defendant:
GREG HARTLEY, MARK BOWDEN, CHASE HUGHES and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
SCOTT v. MCFARLANE
as 7:2024cv00019
Petitioner:
DARRELL BERNARD SCOTT, JR
Respondent:
ANDREW MCFARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF GEORGIA (NOTICE) and ANDREW MCFARLANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ASH v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
JABBARI KEYON ASH, SR
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TYRONE OLIVER and WARDEN SCOTT WILKES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODS v. WIZA
as 4:2024cv00008
Petitioner:
FABIAN WOODS, JR
Respondent:
Warden SCOTT WIZA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SCOTT v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 5:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER WAYNE SCOTT
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
