Cases 1 - 10 of 66
HAGADORN v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION et al
as 1:2023cv00089
Plaintiff:
ROSE MARIE HAGADORN
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP (DELAWARE), A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, WALMART, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
BENTON v. SAMS EAST INC et al
as 4:2022cv00022
Plaintiff:
Vickie Benton
Defendant:
SAM'S EAST INC, WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP, WAL-MART STORES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GUNNELLS et al v. WAL-MART STORES INC
as 3:2020cv00011
Plaintiff:
JAMES GUNNELLS and CINDY FAYE GUNNELLS
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MORELAND v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.
as 5:2020cv00012
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES INC
Plaintiff:
CEIRA MORELAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOUSTON COUNTY v. PURDUE PHARMA LP et al
as 5:2018cv00248
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION, ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC. f/k/a WATSON PHARMA, INC., PURDUE PHARMA L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
HOUSTON COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
GRIFFIN v. WAL-MART STORES INC
as 1:2018cv00113
Plaintiff:
STEVEN BRETT GRIFFIN
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES INC and WAL-MART STORES EAST LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Griffin v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.
as 1:2018cv00114
Plaintiff:
Steven Brett Griffin
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WINCHESTER v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv00053
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES INC and WAL-MART STORES EAST LP
Plaintiff:
OPHELIA WINCHESTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
HUMPHREY v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.
as 1:2017cv00214
Plaintiff:
DAMIAN HUMPHREY
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BELL v. WAL-MART STORES INC
as 7:2017cv00194
Plaintiff:
MARIE BELL and JAMES BELL
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
