Cases 101 - 110 of 2,165
King et al v. Monsanto Company
as 1:2021cv04542
Plaintiff:
Arthur J. King, Jr. and Veronique L. Horne-King
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walton v. 3M Company, Inc.
as 1:2021cv04765
Plaintiff:
Lamont J. Walton
Defendant:
3M Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl
Lang v. Sig Sauer, Inc.
as 1:2021cv04196
Plaintiff:
Robert Lang
Defendant:
Sig Sauer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jones v. Ningbo Liqi Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd. et al
as 1:2021cv04588
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc., Ningbo Liqi Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd., Geneva Industrial Group, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Jerome Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parker v. Bird Rides, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv04299
Plaintiff:
Katherine L. Parker
Defendant:
Bird Rides, Inc. and XYZ Corporations Nos. 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Smith v. Carolina Handling, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv01518
Defendant:
Raymond Corporation, Carolina Handling, LLC and John Does 1-3
Plaintiff:
Jermal Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Stephenson v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 3:2021cv00164
Plaintiff:
Gary Stephenson
Defendant:
Cook Incorporated, Cook Medical Incorporated, Cook Group Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ivey, Jr. v. Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc.
as 1:2021cv03283
Plaintiff:
Gregory Ivey, Jr.
Defendant:
Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03331
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SWOPE et al v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC et al
as 1:2021cv02691
Plaintiff:
Deborah Swope and JOHN SWOPE
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc, Teva Women's Health Inc doing business as Teva Women's Health LLC, Teva Women's Health LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
