Cases 11 - 20 of 5,853
Mumford v. Fulton County Jail
as 1:2024cv02428
Petitioner:
Lloyd Mumford
Respondent:
Fulton County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ruddock v. Labat et al
as 1:2024cv02410
Petitioner:
O'Kang Andre Ruddock
Respondent:
Patrick Labat and Fulton County Sheriffs Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bussey v. Phams
as 3:2024cv00102
Petitioner:
Arthur Shermaine Bussey
Respondent:
Angela Phams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mitchell v. Jones
as 1:2024cv02411
Petitioner:
Kaivon Mitchell
Respondent:
Joshua Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rice v. Jones et al
as 4:2024cv00138
Petitioner:
Jonathan Rice
Respondent:
Warden Joshua Jones, Tyrone Oliver, Officer Porter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bankhead v. Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2024cv02387
Petitioner:
Diandra Bankhead
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stevens v. Jones
as 1:2024cv02360
Petitioner:
Yakenski Stevens
Respondent:
Joshua Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cali v. All Authorities Nation Wide
as 4:2024cv00132
Petitioner:
Saleeban Maxameth Cali and Saleeban Isse Adan
Respondent:
All Authorities Nation Wide
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wrice v. Thomas
as 1:2024cv02261
Petitioner:
Christopher John Wrice
Respondent:
Micheal Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cali v. All Authorities Nation Wide
as 1:2024cv02276
Petitioner:
Saleeban Maxameth Cali and Saleeban Isse Adan
Respondent:
All Authorities Nation Wide
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
