General Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Cases 11 - 20 of 5,858
Smith v. Maddox
as 1:2024cv02514
Petitioner: Stephenson Lamar Smith
Respondent: Melody M. Maddox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Upton
as 1:2024cv01608
Petitioner: Jonathan Hill
Respondent: Warden Steve Upton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gobert v. Perry
as 4:2024cv00146
Petitioner: Michael James Gobert
Respondent: Warden James Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bankhead v. Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2024cv02387
Petitioner: Diandra Bankhead
Respondent: Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dent v. Adams
as 1:2024cv02453
Petitioner: Terrance Dent
Respondent: Robert Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Castillanos v. State of Georgia We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv01656
Petitioner: Eduardo Castillanos
Defendant: Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Respondent: State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mumford v. Fulton County Jail
as 1:2024cv02428
Petitioner: Lloyd Mumford
Respondent: Fulton County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Diarra v. Biden
as 1:2024cv02429
Petitioner: Moussa U'nra Diarra
Respondent: U. S. President Joe Biden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adan v. Doe
as 1:2024cv02432
Petitioner: Saleeban Isse Adan
Respondent: JOHN AND OR JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davenport v. Davis
as 4:2024cv00142
Plaintiff: Gregory Allen Davenport
Defendant: Walt Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?