Cases 21 - 30 of 5,858
Alvarez-Cuan v. Warden Thomas
as 1:2024cv01501
Petitioner:
Luis Alberto Alvarez-Cuan
Respondent:
Warden Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Brooks et al v. Reynolds et al
as 1:2024cv01460
Petitioner:
Barry Brooks and Adom Brooks
Respondent:
Sheriff Frank Reynolds, Shannon Wallace and Jeffrey S. Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bussey v. Phams
as 3:2024cv00102
Petitioner:
Arthur Shermaine Bussey
Respondent:
Angela Phams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mitchell v. Jones
as 1:2024cv02411
Petitioner:
Kaivon Mitchell
Respondent:
Joshua Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ruddock v. Labat et al
as 1:2024cv02410
Petitioner:
O'Kang Andre Ruddock
Respondent:
Patrick Labat and Fulton County Sheriffs Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stevens v. Jones
as 1:2024cv02360
Petitioner:
Yakenski Stevens
Respondent:
Joshua Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rice v. Jones et al
as 4:2024cv00138
Petitioner:
Jonathan Rice
Respondent:
Warden Joshua Jones, Tyrone Oliver, Officer Porter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Batten v. McBurney
as 1:2024cv01667
Plaintiff:
Emory Batten
Defendant:
Judge McBurney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Sheriff Bobb
as 3:2024cv00096
Petitioner:
Timothy A. Thomas
Respondent:
Sheriff Bobb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roller v. State of Georgia, Warden
as 1:2024cv01591
Plaintiff:
Jackie Ray Roller
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
