Cases 11 - 20 of 141
Edwards v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2019cv04101
Defendant:
Harold L. Murphy, William Foster, III, Janet King and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Culbreath v. Stephenson et al
as 1:2019cv03303
Defendant:
Brian Owens and Jay C. Stephenson
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Culbreath
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daker v. Deal et al
as 1:2018cv05243
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Cobb County Superior Court, Christopher Michael Carr and others
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ludy v. Mills et al
as 4:2018cv00249
Defendant:
Jacqueline Bunn, Brian Owens, Braxton T. Cotton and others
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Lavern Ludy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walsh v. State Board of Pardons and Paroles et al
as 1:2018cv04469
Defendant:
Jacqueline Bunn, Braxton C. Cotton, Brian Owens and others
Plaintiff:
William Walsh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harper v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2018cv01763
Plaintiff:
James Shivers Harper
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, James E. Donald, Brian Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. The State Board of Pardons and Paroles et al
as 1:2018cv00770
Plaintiff:
Segral Seville Watkins
Defendant:
The State Board of Pardons and Paroles, James W. Mills, Braxton T. Cotton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pugh v. Elmore et al
as 1:2017cv04269
Plaintiff:
Anthony G. Pugh
Defendant:
Ann Elmore, John Lloyd, James Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berry v. Johnson et al
as 1:2017cv01280
Plaintiff:
Delwin Berry
Defendant:
Bryson Edwina Johnson, Ammos Taylor, William Danforth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hesterlee v. Owens et al
as 1:2016cv02580
Plaintiff:
Neal F. Hesterlee
Defendant:
Brian Owens, Derek Boehringer, Terry Barnard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
