Cases 11 - 20 of 236
Ortiz v. Reed
as 1:2023cv03585
Petitioner:
Sergio Daniel Ortiz
Respondent:
Marjorie Isabel Martinez Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11601 International Child Abduction Remedies Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03334
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02524
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00904
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04764
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Superior Business Management, Inc. et al v. Macias Gini & O'Connell LLP et al
as 1:2022cv02861
Defendant:
Anthony Smalls, Macias Gini & O'Connell LLP doing business as MGO LLP, Danielle Berg and others
Plaintiff:
Superior Business Management, Inc., Superior Tax Solutions, LLC and Kris Benson
DemoBlox, Inc. v. Terminus Software, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02398
Plaintiff:
DemoBlox, Inc.
Counter Claimant:
Terminus Software, Inc.
Defendant:
Saleo, Inc., Justin McDonald and Daniel Hellerman
Lawrence v. Unknown Defendant
as 1:2022mi00037
Plaintiff:
Danielle Lawrence
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 No Cause Specified
YER USA, Inc. et al v. Walsh et al
as 1:2022cv00698
Plaintiff:
YER USA, Inc. and Camilla Daniels
Defendant:
Martin J. Walsh and Yasheka Magloire
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
