Cases 91 - 100 of 109
Abrams v. Kemp
as 1:2009cv01828
Petitioner:
Cardell Abrams
Respondent:
Ralph Kemp and Brian Owens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Berry v. Kemp et al
as 1:2009cv01766
Petitioner:
Freeman Berry
Respondent:
Ralph Kemp and Ralph Kemp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Dunn v. Kemp
as 4:2009cv00091
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Lebron Dunn, Jr.
Defendant:
Ralph Kemp
Intervenor Defendant:
Brian Owens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Walker v. Kemp et al
as 1:2009cv00964
Plaintiff:
Malik Ahmad Walker
Defendant:
William Thomas Kemp, III, R. S. Davis and Linda Warren Hunter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Laster v. Kemp
as 1:2009cv00855
Petitioner:
Robert G. Laster
Respondent:
Ralph Kemp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walker v. Davis et al
as 1:2009cv00759
Plaintiff:
Malik Ahmad Walker
Defendant:
R. S. Davis, W. Thomas Kemp, III and Linda Warren Hunter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bridges v. Kemp et al
as 1:2008cv03048
Petitioner:
Casey Bridges
Respondent:
Ralph Kemp, L. Gale Buckner and Thurbert Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Horne v. Kemp
as 1:2008cv02976
Petitioner:
Christian Horne
Respondent:
Ralph Kemp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Neese et al v. Kemp
as 2:2008cv00192
Petitioner:
Michael Warren Neese
Respondent:
Ralph Kemp and James Donald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kemp v. Wisington et al
as 1:2008cv02902
Plaintiff:
Leroi K. Kemp
Defendant:
Thomas J. (Jeff) Wisington and Correct Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
