Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Santry v. Fulton County Georgia et al
as 1:2021cv01374
Defendant:
Robb Pitts, Bozich, Naphcare and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Shawn Santry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holloway v. Fulton County Jail Sheriff's Dept. et al
as 1:2020cv01138
Plaintiff:
Arnderico Holloway
Defendant:
Fulton County Police Dept., Fulton County Jail Sheriff's Dept. and Naphcare Medical Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cozart v. NaphCare et al
as 1:2019cv04970
Defendant:
NaphCare and Theodore Jackson
Plaintiff:
Calib Cozart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stubblefield v. Medical Director for Naphcare Medical et al
as 1:2019cv02226
Defendant:
Officer Alston, Dr. Christine Jimenez and Medical Director for Naphcare Medical
Plaintiff:
Marc Stubblefield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Jackson et al
as 1:2018cv04738
Plaintiff:
Paul Richardson
Defendant:
Theodore "Ted" Jackson, P.A. Zanebee, Nurse Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sheerer v. Moody et al
as 1:2018cv03267
Defendant:
Naphcare Medical, Officer Reed, Officer Graham and others
Plaintiff:
Dominick Francis Sheerer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amato v. Brown et al
as 1:2011cv01879
Plaintiff:
Frank Charles Amato
Defendant:
Ezell Brown, Sammy Banks, Salina Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stowe v. Newton County et al
as 1:2011cv00916
Plaintiff:
Darrell Anthony Stowe
Defendant:
Newton County, Ozburn, Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Naphcare
as 1:2008cv03273
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Campbell
Defendant:
Naphcare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baynes v. NAPHCARE Health Care, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00541
Plaintiff:
Kenneth L. Baynes
Defendant:
NAPHCARE Health Care, Inc., Terri Noel, Lisa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
