Cases 11 - 20 of 1,179
Gray v. Danforth
as 1:2024cv01751
Petitioner:
Ronald B. Gray
Respondent:
Warden William Danforth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. Barriard
as 1:2024cv01726
Plaintiff:
William M. Taylor
Defendant:
Terry E. Barriard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Oliver
as 1:2024cv01571
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Eugene Williams
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cochran v. Wood et al
as 3:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Nathan Thomas Cochran
Defendant:
Sheriff Lenn Wood, Major Eric Smith, Sgt Josh Joyner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Maddox et al
as 1:2024cv01297
Petitioner:
Stephenson Lamar Smith
Respondent:
Melody M. Maddox, Chief's of Sheriffs office in Dekalb County, Tyrone Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Malone v. Dix
as 3:2024cv00059
Petitioner:
William Malone, Jr.
Respondent:
Sheriff Darrell Dix
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Malone v. Spalding County
as 3:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
William Malone, Jr.
Defendant:
Spalding County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burke v. Sales
as 1:2024cv01202
Plaintiff:
William Burke
Defendant:
WARDEN TIMOTHY SALES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Soto v. Coweta County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Darius Jason Soto
Defendant:
Coweta County Sheriff's Office, Josh Joyner, Debra Found and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pye v. Oliver et al
as 3:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
William James Pye
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver, Christopher Carr, State Board of Pardons and Paroles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
