Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Cases 11 - 20 of 19,167
Adan v. Doe
as 1:2024cv02432
Petitioner: Saleeban Isse Adan
Respondent: JOHN AND OR JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dent v. Adams
as 1:2024cv02453
Petitioner: Terrance Dent
Respondent: Robert Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rhodes v. G.S.P Georgia State Patrol et al
as 1:2024cv02454
Plaintiff: Andre Lemar Rhodes
Defendant: G.S.P Georgia State Patrol, G.S.P Officers and Officer Swain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swope v. USA
as 1:2024cv02463
Plaintiff: Lakisha Swope
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Diarra v. Biden
as 1:2024cv02429
Petitioner: Moussa U'nra Diarra
Respondent: U. S. President Joe Biden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davenport v. Davis
as 4:2024cv00142
Plaintiff: Gregory Allen Davenport
Defendant: Walt Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mumford v. Fulton County Jail
as 1:2024cv02428
Petitioner: Lloyd Mumford
Respondent: Fulton County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02430
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
Pace v. Turner
as 1:2024cv02427
Plaintiff: Terry Terrell Pace
Defendant: Roland Y. Turner, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ruddock v. Labat et al
as 1:2024cv02410
Petitioner: O'Kang Andre Ruddock
Respondent: Patrick Labat and Fulton County Sheriffs Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?