Cases 21 - 30 of 366
Hargrove v. Labat et al
as 1:2022cv00932
Petitioner:
Daniel P. Hargrove
Respondent:
Sheriff Labat and Governor Kemp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cobble v. Cobb Sheriff
as 1:2022cv00684
Petitioner:
Daniel Eric Cobble
Respondent:
Cobb Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cobble v. Cobb Sheriff
as 1:2022cv00588
Petitioner:
Daniel Eric Cobble
Respondent:
Cobb Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cobble v. Cobb Sheriff
as 1:2022cv00522
Petitioner:
Daniel Cobble
Respondent:
Cobb Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Palmer v. Phifer et al
as 1:2022cv00521
Plaintiff:
Michael Leonard Palmer
Defendant:
Officer Phifer, Other MARTA Police Officers and Officer Danielle Phifer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter et al v. Lablatt et al
as 1:2022cv00434
Plaintiff:
Carlos Carter, Johnny Holloman, Jr., Kenton Robertson and others
Defendant:
Sheriff Lablat, Judge Wolf, Fani Willis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cobble v. Owens
as 1:2022cv00413
Petitioner:
Daniel Eric Cobble
Respondent:
Craig Owens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hargrove v. State of GA et al
as 1:2022cv00392
Petitioner:
Daniel P. Hargrove
Respondent:
State of GA and Sheriff Lablatt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hargrove v. Lablatt et al
as 1:2022cv00219
Petitioner:
Daniel P. Hargrove
Respondent:
Sheriff Lablatt, Judge Oliver, Gov. Kemp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cobble v. Owens et al
as 1:2022cv00221
Petitioner:
Daniel Eric Cobble
Respondent:
Sheriff Craig Owens, GDC Commissioner and USBOP Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
