Cases 31 - 40 of 439
Headrick v. Chitwood et al
as 2:2023cv00088
Plaintiff:
Nathan David Headrick
Defendant:
Sheriff Scott Chitwood and Nurse Teasley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Headrick v. Chitwood et al
as 4:2023cv00103
Plaintiff:
Nathan David Headrick
Defendant:
Sheriff Scott Chitwood and Nurse Teasley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lyons v. Emmons
as 4:2023cv00095
Petitioner:
Scott Lyons
Respondent:
Sean Emmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Maddox et al
as 1:2023cv02083
Plaintiff:
Charlie Scott
Defendant:
Melody M. Maddox, Well Path and Grady Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Ella et al
as 4:2023cv00086
Plaintiff:
Terrence James Scott
Defendant:
Unit Mngr Ella, Officer Hawkins and Shawn Emmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Wilkes
as 1:2023cv01998
Petitioner:
Marvin Martin
Respondent:
Scott Wilkes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robertson et al v. Swope et al
as 3:2023cv00077
Petitioner:
Reginald Roderick Robertson
Respondent:
Matthe Swope, Scott Kilgore, Lenn Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Evans v. Fulton County Jail et al
as 1:2023cv01450
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott Evans
Defendant:
Fulton County Jail, Officer Hammond, Officer Franklin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Shropshire
as 1:2023cv01339
Petitioner:
Jonathan Scott
Respondent:
Warden Shropshire
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Leonard v. Wilkes
as 1:2023cv01233
Petitioner:
Sentavious Leonard
Defendant:
Scott Wilkes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
