Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Cases 51 - 60 of 19,117
Cammon v. Haddix et al
as 4:2024cv00069
Plaintiff: Tracy L. Cammon
Defendant: Rachel Haddix and Correct Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McMillian v. Babb
as 3:2024cv00079
Petitioner: Christopher McMillian
Respondent: Sheriff Babb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woods v. Wiza
as 1:2024cv01884
Petitioner: Fabian Woods, Jr.
Respondent: Scott Wiza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lindsey v. Babb
as 3:2024cv00080
Petitioner: Kyle Jordan Lindsey
Respondent: Sheriff Babb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01885
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
Wingfield v. Pham
as 1:2024cv01877
Plaintiff: Timothy B. Wingfield
Defendant: Angela Phams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Georgia Department of Behavioral Health
as 1:2024cv01878
Plaintiff: Christopher Jose Adams
Defendant: Georgia Department of Behavioral Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv01243
Plaintiff: Angelo Bernard Banks
Defendant: State of Georgia and Georgia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Gray v. Danforth
as 1:2024cv00985
Petitioner: Ronald B. Gray
Respondent: Lt. Danforth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Colston v. Babb
as 3:2024cv00054
Petitioner: Bobby Jones Colston
Respondent: Sheriff Babb and Warden Joshua Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?